tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1084784365151727367.post4627193672368961898..comments2017-06-02T17:20:09.270-08:00Comments on OMFGAlaska: Trig Truthers vs. Trig Deniers -- more proof of a colossal waste of time.Lazarhathttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03385885201009012907noreply@blogger.comBlogger13125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1084784365151727367.post-38206974917080833142011-01-06T16:50:26.496-09:002011-01-06T16:50:26.496-09:00Thanks for sticking to your guns. I'm tired of...Thanks for sticking to your guns. I'm tired of blogs being turned into weapons of mass distraction. As you point out, there's so much real, provable dirt on $P, that it's a waste of time no matter who Trig's birth mother really is.Zyxommanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1084784365151727367.post-6116615674474363342010-08-02T11:52:06.022-08:002010-08-02T11:52:06.022-08:00No, Anonymous. I saw it and read it, a fact you co...No, Anonymous. I saw it and read it, a fact you conveniently ignore even though I've stated it at least three times now. What I said is I cannot provide YOU a link to it so you can prove or disprove YOUR case. Because again, in MY OPINION, it doesn't fucking matter. Lastly it's my blog. I get to decide what is and isn't published. Get over yourself. You have a problem with my decisions over which comments to include or not, go publish your own damn blog. Anonymous, indeed. Ha!<br /><br />-LazLazarhathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03385885201009012907noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1084784365151727367.post-36705699840029951782010-07-31T21:24:16.284-08:002010-07-31T21:24:16.284-08:00Well I understand why you no longer work there - y...Well I understand why you no longer work there - your squishy ethics indeedy. If the document you saw is only in your head then I will consider this blog your fiction. Maybe you will let this comment post since you must have 'corrected the spelling' on the earlier one.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1084784365151727367.post-4151362058260932622010-07-31T21:05:30.488-08:002010-07-31T21:05:30.488-08:00Thanks Laz! This group has gotten themselves into ...Thanks Laz! This group has gotten themselves into a tizzy and for me, it's not what they believe, it's how they act. I've been posting side by side with many of them for almost two years, and have watched them slip away into hate, denial, and personal attacks. I'm done with them and the controversy because I don't like what the group has become. They are borg like and very unpleasant as a group. They are channeling the bots as far as I'm concerned. You might as well be listening to the poor lost folks, full of anger and hatred themselves, at C4P with a few names changed around.<br /><br />I don't do fanatics, period. Especially those who turn on their own - the classic "end justifies the means". I'm tired of them bashing my friends and bloggers, and I'm tired of their weary, "in your face", "we are the special ones". In fact, I refudiate the whole damn gutteral mandation!<br /><br />Thanks for posting. Moving on!Snowing in Alaskanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1084784365151727367.post-48437373142798472152010-07-31T19:58:56.233-08:002010-07-31T19:58:56.233-08:00(and this comment removed and moved to keep it in ...(and this comment removed and moved to keep it in context with the words 'see the message above')<br /><br />And thank you for your comments, KaJo. See the message above. I no longer work there. I disclosed little other than my personal impression as a disinterested third party and I have nothing to gain other than the ire of some or hopefully the awakening of others who may, for the sake of their own sanity, drop the subject and move along. I am convinced it is a waste of time and a dead end. If you find my story lacking then I assume that I am not being personally convincing enough. Sorry. To me, the proof is me and what I already know personally and now I can move on and never have to write about it ever again. Thank you.<br /><br />-LazLazarhathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03385885201009012907noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1084784365151727367.post-41699484004311649252010-07-31T19:57:04.958-08:002010-07-31T19:57:04.958-08:00(Removed above to correct spelling and grammar err...(Removed above to correct spelling and grammar errors)<br /><br />First the pseudonym is 'Lazarhat'. Second I didn't say it was or wasn't true, I said essentially "what difference does it make". Third, I've seen TONS of official documents about TONS of different things in this state and I am sworn to confidentiality. So why I must be vague when reporting that first hand. No details, only I know that I know what I saw and may have read. And for the record I never will reveal THE DETAILS of what I saw and read. Only that I saw it and read it. Also, in spite of that personal point of (what some might say are my OWN squishy) ethics, I am no longer in that business. I've seen the cbj document you refer to. It isn't that document. And you will never see the document I saw because it is covered under attorney-client privilege. Which is why I won't give any more details than I have. I say it said what I said it said, convincing enough for me to believe it and it was signed. End of story. Believe me or not, I don't care. Because I'm still saying other than pointing to character, no laws were broken, so what does it matter?<br /><br />Okay? There is no "look it up yourself", the photocopy of it is IN MY HEAD as someone who has worked THAT close to this issue in Alaska.<br /><br />Further affiant sayeth naught.<br /><br />-LazLazarhathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03385885201009012907noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1084784365151727367.post-4042647960340275262010-07-31T19:44:03.229-08:002010-07-31T19:44:03.229-08:00This comment has been removed by the author.Lazarhathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03385885201009012907noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1084784365151727367.post-9124136389930615082010-07-31T19:35:11.444-08:002010-07-31T19:35:11.444-08:00This comment has been removed by the author.Lazarhathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03385885201009012907noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1084784365151727367.post-61122536060350229942010-07-31T07:13:49.567-08:002010-07-31T07:13:49.567-08:00From your last blog post: "...you are prompt...From your last blog post: <i>"...you are prompting me to again waste my time addressing the concerns of <b>the unwashed 'Trig Truther' and 'Trig Deniers' masses</b>. So I will. In another blog post."</i><br /><br />You just firmly put yourself in lockstep with the other Alaska bloggers who appear to be putting their careers, reputations, standing in the blogosphere, personal comfort level, and possibly even safety ahead of a plainly obvious problem that has been systematically ridiculed or ignored for no good reason by either mainstream media or most alternative media.<br /><br />I found your previous blog post completely unpersuasive. The tone seemed akin to a mental picture of someone jumping up and down in frustration shouting "why won't you all LISTEN to me??" with, really, not much else to say.<br /><br />You said above, <i>"Yes, I've seen a signed statement from her doctor and not the one you keep sending me links to.... I am well aware of that one. What I saw was completely different. <b>I cannot prove it or point you to it, nor will I because what I saw wasn't publicly available</b>. What I saw was part of a disclosure process in a lawsuit owing to my previous job as a litigation support technician. It is <b>a point of personal ethics that I cannot disclose all the details of this</b> or any other case I worked on. I can't and I won't. I can only say I saw it. It looked real to me and you just have to take that at face value."</i><br /><br />Then, as a "litigation support technician, YOU OUGHT TO HAVE KEPT INFORMATION ABOUT WHAT YOU SAW TO YOURSELF, ever think about that?<br /><br />Because REFERRING TO IT WITHOUT BEING ABLE TO PRODUCE IT is as stupid and futile and without purpose as believing anything Sarah Palin has ever said -- which, of course, is the sum total of The Myth of Sarah Palin -- something not to be believed.KaJohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11043005602676549904noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1084784365151727367.post-7207489606272069802010-07-31T05:50:06.972-08:002010-07-31T05:50:06.972-08:00Another long "Leave Babygate Alone!!" po...Another long "Leave Babygate Alone!!" post? Methinks the blogger doth protest too much. We get your point, you want other people to stop pursuing what they believe might bring Sarah down because you don't think it's true. I doubt that's going to happen no matter how many times you insist it should be so. You're free to do your thing, leave other people alone to theirs. I am more than happy to see her play crybaby victim. Her FB's and Tweets make her look silly. Nobody wants a crybaby victim for President. <br /><br />Just to clarify for 8:46 PM, Lazar never said he has personally seen or possesses a copy of a letter signed by the doctor claiming she saw the baby come out of Sarah Palin. Lazar said he saw a statement on an Alaskan blog. The only thing signed by the doctor published on a blog is the doctor's medical summary issued the night before the election. That summary does not state she personally delivered the baby out of Sarah Palin. If such a statement existed, it would be on C4P and SarahPAC. It isn't a good thing when a blogger makes a claim and then says " look it up yourself".Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1084784365151727367.post-47986231313968435562010-07-30T20:46:15.656-08:002010-07-30T20:46:15.656-08:00I really appreciated reading your post. I wish som...I really appreciated reading your post. I wish someone in the know would investigate the house that "Todd built with his buddies" and where the materials came from the build that house.<br /><br />I also appreciate your honesty and not using your position to publish a letter that you have actually seen for yourself.<br /><br />I just found you recently but plan to be a regular reader.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1084784365151727367.post-58397433390182507602010-07-30T13:56:21.348-08:002010-07-30T13:56:21.348-08:00Bravo for a brave post.
I'm sorry you're ...Bravo for a brave post.<br /><br />I'm sorry you're taking heat for this stand. I'm sorry you have to take this stand at all.<br /><br />I'm no Palin lover - absolutely the contray. I read a lot of the Alaska blogs, and really appreciate them on the whole. Some of the research that Palingates, for instance, has done on SarahPAC's shenanigans (especially the links with NOW) has blown me away. You won't find that information anywhere else. It's investigative blogging at its best.<br /><br />Then I check in another time and it's Triggate wall to wall, and I despair. I recall when HuffPo picked up on the SaraPAC funding that PG had published. Well-meaning people from PG turned up on the HuffPo comments and immediately started plugging Triggate again rather than following up on the interest generated by the subject at hand. I'm sure I'm not the only one it's a turnoff for. <br /><br />I know feelings run strong and people get frustrated, but it's counterprodutive, and it can so easily play into Palin's devious hands.<br /><br />Thanks for your post. It needed to be said.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1084784365151727367.post-72510534284572797562010-07-30T13:20:13.804-08:002010-07-30T13:20:13.804-08:00Amen! And well said.Amen! And well said.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com